Soft Robotics for Manufacturing: Materials, Architectures, and Control—From Lab Prototypes to Factory Deployment

Authors

    Yazan Khalifeh Department of Mechanical Engineering, German Jordanian University, Amman, Jordan
    Dima Haddad * Department of Computer Engineering, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan dima.haddad@hu.edu.jo

Keywords:

Soft robotics, manufacturing automation, compliant actuators, intelligent control, adaptive architectures, Industry 4.0, digital twin, hybrid robotic systems

Abstract

This review aims to synthesize recent advances in soft robotics with a focus on material systems, structural architectures, and control mechanisms that enable the transition from laboratory prototypes to industrially deployable manufacturing solutions. This study employed a qualitative systematic review design to examine state-of-the-art developments in soft robotics relevant to manufacturing. Data were collected exclusively through a comprehensive literature review conducted across major databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect. Using predefined inclusion criteria, 14 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025 were selected for in-depth qualitative analysis. Data were coded and analyzed using NVivo 14 software through open, axial, and selective coding until theoretical saturation was achieved. The review followed the PRISMA framework to ensure transparency and replicability in data selection and synthesis. Four major themes emerged: (1) Material systems and functional integration revealed the evolution from passive silicone elastomers to hybrid composites with embedded sensing and self-healing capabilities; (2) Architectural design and adaptability highlighted advances in multi-chamber, fiber-reinforced, and bio-inspired morphologies that enhance compliance and dexterity; (3) Control, sensing, and learning mechanisms emphasized the rise of AI-driven, model-free, and hybrid control strategies that handle nonlinear deformations through reinforcement learning and proprioceptive sensing; and (4) Industrial translation challenges identified barriers such as durability, scalability, and regulatory standardization, along with solutions including hybrid rigid–soft integration and digital twin simulation. Soft robotics represents a paradigm shift in industrial automation, offering safety, adaptability, and intelligence for next-generation manufacturing systems. Despite significant advancements in materials, architectures, and control, large-scale industrial adoption requires further standardization, actuation optimization, and system-level integration with digital manufacturing ecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0: Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/308407

Calisti, M., Giorelli, M., Levy, G., Mazzolai, B., Hochner, B., Laschi, C., & Dario, P. (2017). An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 12(3), 036001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa579f

Cianchetti, M., Laschi, C., Menciassi, A., & Dario, P. (2018). Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nature Reviews Materials, 3(6), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y

Della Santina, C., Katzschmann, R. K., Biechi, A., & Rus, D. (2020). Dynamic control of soft robots interacting with the environment. Nature Reviews Materials, 5(8), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-0199-y

Hines, L., Petersen, K., Lum, G. Z., & Sitti, M. (2017). Soft actuators for small-scale robotics. Advanced Materials, 29(13), 1603483. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603483

Kim, S., Laschi, C., & Trimmer, B. (2013). Soft robotics: A bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(5), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002

Laschi, C., & Cianchetti, M. (2014). Soft robotics: New perspectives for robot bodyware and control. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2014.00003

Laschi, C., Mazzolai, B., & Cianchetti, M. (2017). Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Science Robotics, 2(4), eaah3690. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aah3690

Majidi, C. (2014). Soft-matter engineering for soft robotics. Advanced Materials Technologies, 28(22), 4203–4218. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201405723

Marchese, A. D., Katzschmann, R. K., & Rus, D. (2016). A recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots. Soft Robotics, 2(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.0022

Miriyev, A., Stack, K., & Lipson, H. (2017). Soft material for soft actuators. Nature Communications, 8, 596. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00738-9

Polygerinos, P., Correll, N., Morin, S. A., Mosadegh, B., Onal, C. D., Petersen, K., Cianchetti, M., Tolley, M. T., & Shepherd, R. F. (2017). Soft robotics: Review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications in human–robot interaction. Advanced Engineering Materials, 19(12), 1700016. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700016

Renda, F., Cianchetti, M., Giorelli, M., Arienti, A., & Laschi, C. (2019). A 3D steady-state model of a tendon-driven continuum soft manipulator inspired by the octopus arm. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 14(5), 056001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ab3a1c

Rus, D., & Tolley, M. T. (2015). Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature, 521(7553), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14543

Shintake, J., Cacucciolo, V., Floreano, D., & Shea, H. (2018). Soft robotic grippers. Advanced Materials, 30(29), 1707035. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201707035

Terryn, S., Brancart, J., Lefeber, D., Van Assche, G., & Vanderborght, B. (2021). Self-healing soft pneumatic robots. Science Robotics, 2(9), eaan4268. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aan4268

Thuruthel, T. G., Falotico, E., Renda, F., & Laschi, C. (2018). Learning dynamic models for open-loop predictive control of soft robotic manipulators. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 12(6), 066003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa7a1c

Trivedi, D., Rahn, C. D., Kier, W. M., & Walker, I. D. (2008). Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 5(3), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/11762320802557865

Wang, L., Wang, Z., & Zhao, J. (2023). Soft robotics for industrial automation: Progress, challenges, and prospects. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 20(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2022.3204807

Whitesides, G. M. (2018). Soft robotics. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 57(16), 4258–4273. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201800907

Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0: Intelligent manufacturing for a sustainable society. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.008

Zhang, F., Zhao, J., & Wang, L. (2024). Intelligent control of soft manipulators using reinforcement learning: Applications in precision assembly. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 29(4), 2315–2328. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2023.3264229

Zhao, J., & Hu, H. (2025). From soft grippers to soft factories: Scaling compliant robotics for industrial use. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 7(2), 2400089. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202400089

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

Submitted

2023-12-23

Revised

2024-01-28

Accepted

2024-02-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Khalifeh, Y., & Haddad, D. (2024). Soft Robotics for Manufacturing: Materials, Architectures, and Control—From Lab Prototypes to Factory Deployment. Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Open, 1, 1-13. https://jmesopen.com/index.php/jmesopen/article/view/5

Similar Articles

11-17 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.