<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Darzin International Company</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Open</JournalTitle>
      <Issn></Issn>
      <Volume>3</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 3</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>A Qualitative Investigation of Innovation Management in Multidisciplinary Engineering Organizations</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>A Qualitative Investigation of Innovation Management in Multidisciplinary Engineering Organizations</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>15</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>14</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to explore how innovation is managed, coordinated, and sustained in multidisciplinary engineering organizations operating in Tehran. This qualitative study was conducted using a conventional thematic analysis approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 24 participants working in multidisciplinary engineering organizations in Tehran, including senior engineering managers, R&amp;amp;D specialists, project managers, systems engineers, design engineers, and technical consultants. Participants were selected through purposive sampling based on direct experience with innovation projects, interdisciplinary collaboration, product or process development, and engineering project implementation. Interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Each interview lasted between 45 and 75 minutes and was audio-recorded with informed consent. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis procedure. NVivo software was used to support data organization, coding, category development, retrieval of coded segments, and comparison of themes across participant groups. Trustworthiness was enhanced through member checking, peer debriefing, audit trail documentation, and researcher reflexivity. Data analysis generated five main categories: strategic framing of innovation, cross-disciplinary knowledge integration, structural and procedural support for innovation, leadership and cultural enablers, and barriers to implementation and commercialization. Participants described innovation as a process shaped by both technical creativity and organizational coordination. Effective innovation management required alignment between engineering expertise, market needs, resource allocation, managerial support, and interdepartmental communication. While multidisciplinary teams expanded the range of ideas and technical solutions, they also created challenges related to language differences, professional boundaries, slow decision-making, and conflict over priorities. Innovation management in multidisciplinary engineering organizations is not limited to idea generation or technical problem-solving; rather, it depends on the organization’s ability to integrate specialized knowledge, create flexible structures, support experimentation, and translate technical concepts into implementable outcomes. The findings suggest that engineering organizations should strengthen boundary-spanning roles, collaborative routines, innovation governance, and leadership practices that connect technical excellence with strategic and commercial value.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Innovation management</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">multidisciplinary engineering</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">qualitative research</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">knowledge integration</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">engineering organizations</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">thematic analysis</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jmesopen.com/index.php/jmesopen/article/download/63/60</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
