Exploring the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Multidisciplinary Engineering Workflows

Authors

    Maryam Al Zadjali * Department of Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman m.alzadjali@gmail.com
    Tariq Al Riyami Department of Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
    Salma Al Busaidi Department of Industrial Engineering, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, multidisciplinary engineering, engineering workflows, qualitative research, human–AI collaboration, Muscat, thematic analysis, digital engineering

Abstract

This study aimed to explore how artificial intelligence is being integrated into multidisciplinary engineering workflows and how engineers perceive its effects on collaboration, design decision-making, professional roles, and organizational readiness. A qualitative descriptive design was employed using semi-structured interviews with 24 engineering professionals working in multidisciplinary engineering organizations in Muscat, Oman. Participants included civil, mechanical, electrical, software, systems, and project engineers, as well as engineering managers with direct experience of AI-supported tools in design, simulation, project coordination, documentation, quality assurance, or decision support. Participants were recruited purposively to capture variation in engineering discipline, professional experience, and organizational role. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed using thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize transcripts, code interview data, compare patterns across disciplinary groups, and develop final themes. Four main categories emerged from the analysis: AI as a boundary-spanning coordination mechanism, AI-enabled acceleration of design exploration and technical decision-making, human oversight and trust in AI-generated outputs, and organizational readiness for sustainable AI integration. Participants described AI as useful for connecting fragmented disciplinary knowledge, reducing repetitive documentation work, supporting early-stage design alternatives, improving simulation preparation, and facilitating cross-functional communication. However, they also emphasized concerns regarding data quality, model explainability, accountability for engineering decisions, software interoperability, and uneven AI literacy across teams. The integration of AI into multidisciplinary engineering workflows is not merely a technical transition but a socio-technical transformation that reshapes collaboration, professional judgment, and organizational learning. Sustainable AI adoption requires high-quality engineering data, transparent governance, domain-specific validation, continuous professional training, and human-centered workflow redesign.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Maashani, Q. (2025, June 2). Oman deploys AI to drive Vision 2040 goals. Oman Observer.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cheng, H., Husen, J. H., Lu, Y., Racharak, T., Yoshioka, N., Ubayashi, N., & Washizaki, H. (2024). Generative AI for requirements engineering: A systematic literature review. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06741

Choudhury, M. M., Eisenbart, B., & Kuys, B. (2025). Artificial intelligence (AI) in the design process: A review and analysis on generative AI perspectives. Proceedings of the Design Society, 5, 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2025.10077

Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 108–116.

Egwim, C. N., Alaka, H., Demir, E., Balogun, H., Olu-Ajayi, R., Sulaimon, I., Wusu, G., Yusuf, W., & Muideen, A. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A systematic review of the entire construction value chain lifecycle. Energies, 17(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17010182

Fang, C., Zhu, Y., Fang, L., Long, Y., Lin, H., Cong, Y., & Wang, S. J. (2025). Generative AI-enhanced human–AI collaborative conceptual design: A systematic literature review. Design Studies, 97, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2025.101300

Huang, J. (2023). Digital engineering transformation with trustworthy AI towards Industry 4.0: Emerging paradigm shifts. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00951

Norheim, J. J., Rebentisch, E., Xiao, D., Draeger, L., Kerbrat, A., & de Weck, O. L. (2024). Challenges in applying large language models to requirements engineering tasks. Design Science, 10, e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2024.8

Obieke, C. C., Bridgeman, J., & Han, J. (2025). A framework of AI collaboration in engineering design (AICED). Proceedings of the Design Society, 5, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2025.10023

Onatayo, D., Onososen, A., Oyediran, A. O., Oyediran, H., Arowoiya, V., & Onatayo, E. (2024). Generative AI applications in architecture, engineering, and construction: Trends, implications for practice, education and imperatives for upskilling—A review. Architecture, 4(4), 877–902. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture4040046

Poulsen, V. V., Guertler, M., Eisenbart, B., & Sick, N. (2025). Advancing systems engineering with artificial intelligence: A review on the future potential, challenges and pathways. Proceedings of the Design Society, 5, 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2025.10050

Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0072

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Verganti, R., Vendraminelli, L., & Iansiti, M. (2020). Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12523

Yüksel, N., Börklü, H. R., Sezer, H. K., & Canyurt, O. E. (2023). Review of artificial intelligence applications in engineering design perspective. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 118, 105697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105697

Published

2026-07-01

Submitted

2026-02-12

Revised

2026-05-09

Accepted

2026-05-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Al Zadjali, M., Al Riyami, T., & Al Busaidi, S. (2026). Exploring the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Multidisciplinary Engineering Workflows. Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Open, 1-13. https://jmesopen.com/index.php/jmesopen/article/view/65

Similar Articles

1-10 of 59

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.