Leadership Challenges in the Transition from Hierarchical to Network-Based Management Systems: A Qualitative Study of Managerial Experiences in Tehran
Keywords:
Network-based management, hierarchical organizations, leadership challenges, organizational change, qualitative research, distributed leadershipAbstract
This study aimed to explore the leadership challenges experienced by managers during the transition from hierarchical management systems to network-based management systems in organizations in Tehran. This qualitative study was conducted using an exploratory phenomenological design. Participants included 24 managers, senior specialists, project leaders, and organizational development professionals working in private and semi-private organizations in Tehran that had recently attempted to move from centralized hierarchical structures toward more collaborative, network-based management arrangements. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, and recruitment continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews lasting between 45 and 75 minutes. Interviews focused on participants’ lived experiences of structural transition, leadership role changes, decision-making practices, resistance, communication patterns, accountability, and coordination challenges. All interviews were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize transcripts, code data, compare categories, and develop final themes. Analysis of the interviews resulted in four main categories: role ambiguity and identity disruption among leaders, resistance to decentralization and loss of control, coordination difficulties in distributed decision-making, and trust-building challenges in cross-functional networks. Participants described the transition as a complex process in which formal authority weakened before collaborative norms became strong enough to replace it. Leaders struggled to redefine their roles from command-and-control decision-makers to facilitators of connection, sensemaking, and shared accountability. Resistance was particularly visible among middle managers who perceived network-based systems as a threat to status, authority, and performance visibility. Participants also reported that horizontal collaboration increased flexibility but created uncertainty regarding responsibility, conflict resolution, and decision ownership. The transition from hierarchical to network-based management systems is not merely a structural redesign but a deep leadership transformation. Successful transition requires leaders to develop relational, facilitative, and adaptive capabilities while simultaneously redesigning governance mechanisms, communication routines, and accountability systems. Organizations should avoid assuming that decentralization automatically produces collaboration; instead, they must actively support leaders in managing ambiguity, building trust, and balancing autonomy with coordination.
Downloads
References
Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455. doi:10.2307/2667105
Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25–46. doi:10.2307/41166121
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 211–283. doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.667612
Diefenbach, T., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2011). Formal and informal hierarchy in different types of organization. Organization Studies, 32(11), 1515–1537. doi:10.1177/0170840611421254
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange theory of leadership over 25 years. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a not quite joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159–1175. doi:10.2307/1556343
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1986). Organizations: New concepts for new forms. California Management Review, 28(3), 62–73. doi:10.2307/41165202
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (Eds.). (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. SAGE Publications.
Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57–76. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.57
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 295–336). JAI Press.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
Raelin, J. A. (2016). Imagine there are no leaders: Reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership, 12(2), 131–158. doi:10.1177/1742715014558076
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66–85. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0088